data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fc5d0/fc5d0bd0b3314d0137aa11422395263f3abd2ce8" alt=""
The
movie was first recommended to me a year or two ago, and later I saw a book
review on a blog I follow. The story sounded wonderful, but I wasn’t sure how
deeply the magic elements were involved. I finally decided to give it a try.
The
story was great. Theological issues aside, it was a fun plot with lovable
characters. A young adult named Sophie is sure she will never be able to seek
her fortune, because she is the eldest. After the Witch of the Waste curses
her, making her an old woman, she sets out to seek her fortune anyways. She
decides to go to the Wizard Howl to get rid of the curse placed on her, and
meets his assistant Michael and the fire-demon Calcifer. Both the castle and
Howl have more than a few secrets, which she finds as she stays with them.
I’m
almost sad that Howl’s Moving Castle is so well written, because it might make
it easier to dislike. The only problem I had with it was the witches and wizards.
There’s the argument that a lot of fairy tales have a witch in them, but then
again the witch in those stories obviously isn’t a good guy. Howl doesn’t
really fit in there.
There
are even Christian stories with witches and wizards, such as The Lord of the
Rings, and The Chronicles of Narnia. Again that doesn’t work, because the White
Witch is definitely evil, and Gandalf isn’t actually a wizard.
A lot
of people could argue that “You’re reading Harry Potter. What’s the
difference?”, and that’s the argument that I had the most trouble with.
However, while Harry and the other wizards are born wizards, Howl and the
witches in this story are trying to learn –and have learned—witchcraft. In
short, Harry Potter doesn’t really come across as evil to me any more than
Elves or Gandalf do. While they do practice magic, it’s because that is a
talent given to their race, like the “magic” that Gandalf does. In Howl’s
Moving Castle, anybody can learn magic. The people aren’t a different race.
I don’t
have a single argument for Calcifer though. He’s a good character like the
rest, but he’s still a fire-demon. Whatever the author meant by that, the fact
that Howl has made an agreement with anything called a “demon” cannot be good.
After I considered it, I think it’s best not to
recommend this book. While I will tell anyone who asks that I enjoyed the
story, it also revolves around more magic than I feel I should recommend. There
isn’t a bunch of spells or explanations the magic, but between the titles of
other books by the same author listed in the front cover, and the simple fact
that witchcraft is wrong, I am reminded of the thought that bad things are
always more successful when they are subtle.
This review has also been posted at Into The Book.
This review has also been posted at Into The Book.
No comments:
Post a Comment